|
Post by ramazakal on Mar 15, 2007 19:12:28 GMT -5
Ok, we need this forum to become active and we can do it. Now all have the right to put down who we should invade next. so lets do it
|
|
|
Post by squeamishossifrage on Mar 16, 2007 16:09:49 GMT -5
I'll follow you anywhere, but I'm more of a Cheerleader than a leader...
|
|
|
Post by ramazakal on Mar 17, 2007 9:04:50 GMT -5
A skeleton cheerleader, that is great
|
|
|
Post by suicide invaders on Mar 19, 2007 19:57:00 GMT -5
do we realy truly want to take down a region or just flash mob it an party? I have about 12 puppets if needed, but only the single UN and I won't break that multi-un rule.
|
|
|
Post by ramazakal on Mar 19, 2007 21:49:16 GMT -5
and we don't want you to break any rules either. I have seen alot of nations try and get away with it and they always get caught. so thankyou for not. As far as puppets go, well I think that the way we are growing we really don't have any need for them as we don't want to get into trouble for oh shoot they have a name for that but can't recall it. As long as they know we are invading them we are somewhat safe from the mods I would imagine. those were good questions and I hope my answers are helpfull. but us skeletons love to party!!!!!!!!!!!111
|
|
|
Post by jubungu on Mar 19, 2007 23:49:52 GMT -5
In my opinion, just getting in for a while is a sucess, and we should count nothing as losses. Maybe we should start going after small regions that are inactive?
|
|
|
Post by ramazakal on Mar 20, 2007 21:44:34 GMT -5
your right, but the more active the region the more interaction and sometimes they acually have a sense of humor and play
|
|
|
Post by jubungu on Mar 21, 2007 11:22:51 GMT -5
However, inactive ones could be easily taken control of.
|
|
astraki
New Member
Swiss Cheese
Posts: 18
|
Post by astraki on Mar 22, 2007 1:00:11 GMT -5
And what would we do with an inactive region? We have 2 or 3 UN nations and none of us would waste our UN nation on keeping an inactive region.
Besides, it would break our losing streak! We can't have that!
Edit: The only interesting way I can see of doing a real invasion would be to take an active region with only one or two endorsements for the delegate (if one exists). One of us goes in as pointman and gains influence, then we bring in a couple of other nations discreetly through a couple of proxies, and then when we're ready to strike, BAM! we flood the whole place with skeletons straight from the Army itself and take delagacy. we'll probably get kicked out again pretty soon, but it will be fun. and surely we have some UN allies to help?
Edit 2: I say we invade Star Wars next. We could do it as a party invasion (lots of things you can do with Star Wars) or a serious invasion (the delegate only has 2 endorsements).
|
|
|
Post by jubungu on Mar 22, 2007 16:08:12 GMT -5
Mind you, I mean no disrespect with my dissent.
|
|
astraki
New Member
Swiss Cheese
Posts: 18
|
Post by astraki on Mar 23, 2007 5:55:02 GMT -5
Looks like we're invading Russia.
The delegate only has 1 endorsement. If there's any UN nations around, go through a very active proxy like East Pacific and we'll endorse each other.
Otherwise, VODKA PARTY TIME!
|
|
|
Post by ramazakal on Mar 23, 2007 17:27:38 GMT -5
do we realy truly want to take down a region or just flash mob it an party? I have about 12 puppets if needed, but only the single UN and I won't break that multi-un rule. Ok, I looked into this and its called puppet flooding and against the rules........so one nation per person is what we are going to stay with so as not to anger the Mods. don't want to do that at this point.
|
|
|
Post by suicideinvaders on Mar 24, 2007 21:44:12 GMT -5
Hey, we had another good turnout today in Russia. ;D I've seen wanna be raiders with more troops & UN's, do a much worse job and have not nearly as much fun. This is the first Raider / Invader group I've ever even heard of that has this much fun. If we can get everyone to prep ther puppets in advance and switch their UN's from their main nations right before an attack, so as not to break any rules, we could really accomplish something with the right target. I'm not certain about tactics so correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as holding small regions without founders, once we get regional control we can password protect them and not have to worry about wasting UN's a place holders. What do you think? Anyway, this is great crew and I'm happy to be here. SI
|
|
|
Post by zuperdogs on Mar 25, 2007 13:44:41 GMT -5
what would be the point of winning? if we start doing that then people will start to dislike us and not give us beer (or vodka in the last case). what would happen then!?!?!?!?!?!?
oh yeah, never break the multi UN rule, i've got 3 banned email addresses from it (once my fault, the other a missunderstanding)
|
|
|
Post by squeamishossifrage on Mar 25, 2007 19:30:25 GMT -5
Yeah, Russia was cool, cold even. Only problem is noone was there. Maybe we should check for board activity before invasion, so we're sure that someone will be there. Cool regions would have a couple posts a day, and a relatively inactive founder (say not logged in for 3 or 4 days), so it would not get ejected right away, and could interact with the locals. From what I saw of the Rohan invasion, and which motivated me to come this can be good fun for both invaders and invadees. I don't think we should fiddle with the UN, although it would be cool to have our 2 UN nations stay overnight in a region where the UN delegate has only 1 or 2 endorsement, endorse someone else at random and declare "control over the region" as happened in Russia. As a last note, I have a lot of fun with the Local Supermarket and I hope no one minds. I have advertised it in the Rejected Realms, and it actually gets a few visits.
El Squeamish Ossifrage
|
|